Jayco Safety Record

Middlebury, IN · Manufacturing

F

Significantly elevated violation rate. This employer's safety record is among the worst on file.

Last inspected 03/12/2024

Based on public OSHA records. How is this calculated? · Data updated March 2026

According to OSHA enforcement records, Jayco in Middlebury, Indiana has 39 workplace safety violations across 10 inspections, with 17 classified as serious and $16,698 in total penalties. Safety grade: F (significantly elevated violations). OSHA records span 1977 to 2024.

Jayco in Middlebury, Indiana has received an F safety grade, indicating a significantly elevated rate of workplace safety violations compared to other employers. Within the manufacturing industry, this places Jayco among the most frequently cited employers. An F grade is assigned when an employer's weighted violation score exceeds 6.0 per inspection, factoring in the severity of each citation.

17 of the 39 violations on record are classified as serious, meaning OSHA determined they posed a risk of death or serious physical harm. Workers at employers with F safety grades may want to understand their rights under OSHA regulations, including the right to file a complaint about unsafe working conditions without fear of retaliation. Indiana workers who have been injured on the job may also be eligible for workers' compensation benefits.

3.9 Jayco violations/inspection
vs
4.1 Manufacturing avg
Below industry average
View Manufacturing industry report →
1 Violations (5 yr)
1 Inspections (5 yr)
1 Serious (5 yr)
$4,095 Penalties (5 yr)
All-time record: 39 violations, $16,698 in penalties across 10 inspections
39 Total Violations
10 Total Inspections
17 Total Serious
$16,698 Total Penalties
Serious?
1 ($4,095)
1910.0304 OSHA Standard
Cited in 3 inspections (4 total) since 1982
1910.0212 Machine Guarding — General
Cited in 3 inspections (3 total) since 1982
1910.0303 Electrical — General Requirements
Cited in 3 inspections (3 total) since 1982
1910.0213 Woodworking Machinery
Cited in 2 inspections (3 total) since 2006
1910.0305 Electrical — Wiring Methods
Cited in 2 inspections (3 total) since 2006
Violations decreased 97% over the past 5 years (1 recent vs 38 prior).
OSHA initially proposed $33,225 in penalties for Jayco, later reduced to $16,698 — a 50% reduction through informal settlement or contest. Learn how OSHA penalties work.
1910.0304 OSHA Standard
4 citations $240
1910.0305 Electrical — Wiring Methods
3 citations
1910.0303 Electrical — General Requirements
3 citations $1,762
1910.0213 Woodworking Machinery
3 citations $2,025
1910.0212 Machine Guarding — General
3 citations $1,919

Workers' Compensation in Indiana

Workers injured on the job in Indiana may be entitled to medical coverage, temporary & permanent disability, death benefits, vocational rehabilitation.

This is general information about workers' compensation laws in Indiana, not legal advice. Consult a licensed attorney for your specific situation.

Were you injured at Jayco?

This employer has 39 OSHA violations on record, including 17 classified as serious. If you've been hurt on the job, you may be entitled to compensation.

Free case review · No obligation · Confidential

Attorney advertising. Free consultations available in most states. Not legal advice. By submitting, you agree to be contacted about your potential claim.

No workplace accident investigations on file for Jayco in OSHA records.

DateTypeLocationViolationsPenalties
03/12/2024 Referral? Middlebury, IN 1 $4,095
06/02/2009 Planned? Middlebury, IN 12 $3,675
08/20/2008 Planned? Middlebury, IN 4 $2,925
03/16/2006 Planned? Middlebury, IN 13 $5,362
12/11/1997 Planned? Middlebury, IN 2 $0
08/09/1993 Planned? Middlebury, IN 0 $0
04/18/1990 Planned? Middlebury, IN 2 $0
04/08/1985 Planned? Middlebury, IN 0 $0
12/29/1982 Planned? Middlebury, IN 5 $640
08/05/1977 Complaint? Middlebury, IN 0 $0

Improve Your Safety Grade

Links may be affiliate-supported. This does not affect our safety ratings or recommendations.

Injured at Jayco? You may be entitled to compensation. Get Free Case Review