Advanced Door Technologies Safety Record

East Stroudsburg, PA · Manufacturing

F

Significantly elevated violation rate. This employer's safety record is among the worst on file.

Last inspected 02/12/2021

Based on public OSHA records. How is this calculated? · Data updated March 2026

According to OSHA enforcement records, Advanced Door Technologies in East Stroudsburg, Pennsylvania has 45 workplace safety violations across 6 inspections, with 34 classified as serious and $31,600 in total penalties. Safety grade: F (significantly elevated violations). OSHA records span 2005 to 2021.

Advanced Door Technologies in East Stroudsburg, Pennsylvania has received an F safety grade, indicating a significantly elevated rate of workplace safety violations compared to other employers. Within the manufacturing industry, this places Advanced Door Technologies among the most frequently cited employers. An F grade is assigned when an employer's weighted violation score exceeds 6.0 per inspection, factoring in the severity of each citation.

34 of the 45 violations on record are classified as serious, meaning OSHA determined they posed a risk of death or serious physical harm. Workers at employers with F safety grades may want to understand their rights under OSHA regulations, including the right to file a complaint about unsafe working conditions without fear of retaliation. Pennsylvania workers who have been injured on the job may also be eligible for workers' compensation benefits.

7.5 Advanced Door Technologies violations/inspection
vs
4.1 Manufacturing avg
Above industry average
View Manufacturing industry report →
45 Violations
6 Inspections
34 Serious
$31,600 Penalties
Serious?
34 ($31,600)
Other-than-Serious?
11 ($0)
1910.0217 OSHA Standard
Cited in 3 inspections (7 total) since 2005
1910.0212 Machine Guarding — General
Cited in 3 inspections (4 total) since 2005
1910.0147 Lockout/Tagout — Machines
Cited in 3 inspections (3 total) since 2005
1910.0178 Powered Industrial Trucks (Forklifts)
Cited in 3 inspections (3 total) since 2005
1910.0134 Respiratory Protection
Cited in 2 inspections (6 total) since 2006
Violations decreased 100% over the past 5 years (0 recent vs 45 prior).
OSHA initially proposed $71,312 in penalties for Advanced Door Technologies, later reduced to $31,600 — a 56% reduction through informal settlement or contest. Learn how OSHA penalties work.
1910.0217 OSHA Standard
7 citations $8,500
1910.0134 Respiratory Protection
6 citations $2,100
1910.0219 Lockout/Tagout (Energy Control)
4 citations $2,300
1910.0212 Machine Guarding — General
4 citations $6,400
1910.0305 Electrical — Wiring Methods
3 citations

Workers' Compensation in Pennsylvania

Workers injured on the job in Pennsylvania may be entitled to medical coverage, temporary & permanent disability, death benefits, vocational rehabilitation, specific loss benefits.

This is general information about workers' compensation laws in Pennsylvania, not legal advice. Consult a licensed attorney for your specific situation.

Were you injured at Advanced Door Technologies?

This employer has 45 OSHA violations on record, including 34 classified as serious. If you've been hurt on the job, you may be entitled to compensation.

Free case review · No obligation · Confidential

Attorney advertising. Free consultations available in most states. Not legal advice. By submitting, you agree to be contacted about your potential claim.

No workplace accident investigations on file for Advanced Door Technologies in OSHA records.

DateTypeLocationViolationsPenalties
02/12/2021 Complaint? East Stroudsburg, PA 0 $0
04/24/2017 Planned? East Stroudsburg, PA 13 $20,000
06/18/2013 Complaint? East Stroudsburg, PA 1 $2,500
06/18/2013 Complaint? East Stroudsburg, PA 5 $2,100
03/03/2006 Complaint? East Stroudsburg, PA 8 $2,000
06/23/2005 Complaint? East Stroudsburg, PA 18 $5,000

Improve Your Safety Grade

Links may be affiliate-supported. This does not affect our safety ratings or recommendations.

Injured at Advanced Door Technologies? You may be entitled to compensation. Get Free Case Review