Fair Haven Vill DPW Safety Record

Fair Haven, NY · Construction

F

Significantly elevated violation rate. This employer's safety record is among the worst on file.

Last inspected 09/15/2017

Based on public OSHA records. How is this calculated? · Data updated March 2026

According to OSHA enforcement records, Fair Haven Vill DPW in Fair Haven, New York has 56 workplace safety violations across 16 inspections, with 35 classified as serious and $0 in total penalties. Safety grade: F (significantly elevated violations). OSHA records span 1988 to 2017.

Fair Haven Vill DPW in Fair Haven, New York has received an F safety grade, indicating a significantly elevated rate of workplace safety violations compared to other employers. Within the construction industry, this places Fair Haven Vill DPW among the most frequently cited employers. An F grade is assigned when an employer's weighted violation score exceeds 6.0 per inspection, factoring in the severity of each citation.

35 of the 56 violations on record are classified as serious, meaning OSHA determined they posed a risk of death or serious physical harm. Workers at employers with F safety grades may want to understand their rights under OSHA regulations, including the right to file a complaint about unsafe working conditions without fear of retaliation. New York workers who have been injured on the job may also be eligible for workers' compensation benefits.

3.5 Fair Haven Vill DPW violations/inspection
vs
2.4 Construction avg
Above industry average
View Construction industry report →
56 Violations
16 Inspections
35 Serious
$0 Penalties
Serious?
35 ($0)
Other-than-Serious?
21 ($0)
1910.0106 Flammable Liquids
Cited in 5 inspections (8 total) since 1988
1910.0305 Electrical — Wiring Methods
Cited in 5 inspections (7 total) since 1988
1910.0303 Electrical — General Requirements
Cited in 4 inspections (5 total) since 1988
1910.1200 Hazard Communication
Cited in 4 inspections (4 total) since 1988
1910.0304 OSHA Standard
Cited in 3 inspections (4 total) since 1988
Violations decreased 100% over the past 5 years (0 recent vs 56 prior).
1910.0106 Flammable Liquids
8 citations
1910.0305 Electrical — Wiring Methods
7 citations
1910.0303 Electrical — General Requirements
5 citations
1910.1200 Hazard Communication
4 citations
1910.0304 OSHA Standard
4 citations

Workers' Compensation in New York

Workers injured on the job in New York may be entitled to medical coverage, temporary & permanent disability, death benefits, vocational rehabilitation, schedule loss of use awards.

This is general information about workers' compensation laws in New York, not legal advice. Consult a licensed attorney for your specific situation.

Were you injured at Fair Haven Vill DPW?

This employer has 56 OSHA violations on record, including 35 classified as serious. If you've been hurt on the job, you may be entitled to compensation.

Free case review · No obligation · Confidential

Attorney advertising. Free consultations available in most states. Not legal advice. By submitting, you agree to be contacted about your potential claim.

No workplace accident investigations on file for Fair Haven Vill DPW in OSHA records.

DateTypeLocationViolationsPenalties
09/15/2017 Follow-Up? Fair Haven, NY 0 $0
07/19/2017 Planned? Fair Haven, NY 5 $0
08/13/2014 Follow-Up? Fair Haven, NY 0 $0
07/08/2014 Planned? Fair Haven, NY 4 $0
08/02/2010 Follow-Up? Fair Haven, NY 0 $0
06/02/2010 Planned? Fair Haven, NY 5 $0
12/05/2007 Follow-Up? Fair Haven, NY 0 $0
10/16/2007 Complaint? Fair Haven, NY 2 $0
10/04/2000 Follow-Up? Fair Haven, NY 0 $0
07/11/2000 Planned? Fair Haven, NY 11 $0
12/22/1992 Follow-Up? Fair Haven, NY 0 $0
09/10/1992 Planned? Fair Haven, NY 7 $0
11/16/1990 Follow-Up? Fair Haven, NY 0 $0
08/07/1990 Planned? Fair Haven, NY 9 $0
03/29/1989 Follow-Up? Fair Haven, NY 0 $0
11/23/1988 Planned? Fair Haven, NY 13 $0

Improve Your Safety Grade

Links may be affiliate-supported. This does not affect our safety ratings or recommendations.

Injured at Fair Haven Vill DPW? You may be entitled to compensation. Get Free Case Review