Cemstone Ready Mix Safety Record

New Richmond, WI · Wholesale Trade

F

Significantly elevated violation rate. This employer's safety record is among the worst on file.

Last inspected 09/07/2023

Based on public OSHA records. How is this calculated? · Data updated March 2026

According to OSHA enforcement records, Cemstone Ready Mix in New Richmond, Wisconsin has 46 workplace safety violations across 5 inspections, with 28 classified as serious and $67,274 in total penalties. Safety grade: F (significantly elevated violations). OSHA records span 1991 to 2023.

Cemstone Ready Mix in New Richmond, Wisconsin has received an F safety grade, indicating a significantly elevated rate of workplace safety violations compared to other employers. Within the wholesale trade industry, this places Cemstone Ready Mix among the most frequently cited employers. An F grade is assigned when an employer's weighted violation score exceeds 6.0 per inspection, factoring in the severity of each citation.

28 of the 46 violations on record are classified as serious, meaning OSHA determined they posed a risk of death or serious physical harm. Workers at employers with F safety grades may want to understand their rights under OSHA regulations, including the right to file a complaint about unsafe working conditions without fear of retaliation. Wisconsin workers who have been injured on the job may also be eligible for workers' compensation benefits.

9.2 Cemstone Ready Mix violations/inspection
vs
3.6 Wholesale Trade avg
Above industry average
View Wholesale Trade industry report →
19 Violations (5 yr)
2 Inspections (5 yr)
12 Serious (5 yr)
$60,674 Penalties (5 yr)
All-time record: 46 violations, $67,274 in penalties across 5 inspections
46 Total Violations
5 Total Inspections
28 Total Serious
$67,274 Total Penalties
Serious?
12 ($48,619)
Other-than-Serious?
6 ($0)
Repeat?
1 ($12,055)
1910.0146 Permit-Required Confined Spaces
Cited in 4 inspections (10 total) since 2004
1910.0147 Lockout/Tagout — Machines
Cited in 4 inspections (9 total) since 2004
1910.0219 Lockout/Tagout (Energy Control)
Cited in 3 inspections (4 total) since 1991
1910.0023 Ladders
Cited in 3 inspections (3 total) since 1991
1910.1053 OSHA Standard
Cited in 2 inspections (3 total) since 2022
Violations decreased 30% over the past 5 years (19 recent vs 27 prior).
OSHA initially proposed $114,107 in penalties for Cemstone Ready Mix, later reduced to $67,274 — a 41% reduction through informal settlement or contest. Learn how OSHA penalties work.
1910.0146 Permit-Required Confined Spaces
10 citations $25,615
1910.0147 Lockout/Tagout — Machines
9 citations $14,910
1910.0219 Lockout/Tagout (Energy Control)
4 citations $1,600
1910.1200 Hazard Communication
3 citations
1910.1053 OSHA Standard
3 citations $5,624

Workers' Compensation in Wisconsin

Workers injured on the job in Wisconsin may be entitled to medical coverage, temporary & permanent disability, death benefits, vocational rehabilitation.

This is general information about workers' compensation laws in Wisconsin, not legal advice. Consult a licensed attorney for your specific situation.

Were you injured at Cemstone Ready Mix?

This employer has 46 OSHA violations on record, including 28 classified as serious. If you've been hurt on the job, you may be entitled to compensation.

Free case review · No obligation · Confidential

Attorney advertising. Free consultations available in most states. Not legal advice. By submitting, you agree to be contacted about your potential claim.

No workplace accident investigations on file for Cemstone Ready Mix in OSHA records.

DateTypeLocationViolationsPenalties
09/07/2023 Follow-Up? New Richmond, WI 6 $24,110
10/25/2022 Complaint? New Richmond, WI 13 $36,564
07/15/2004 Planned? New Richmond, WI 8 $2,350
07/08/2004 Planned? New Richmond, WI 16 $3,300
05/17/1991 Planned? New Richmond, WI 3 $950

Improve Your Safety Grade

Links may be affiliate-supported. This does not affect our safety ratings or recommendations.

Injured at Cemstone Ready Mix? You may be entitled to compensation. Get Free Case Review