Albert Basse Associates Safety Record

Stoughton, MA · Manufacturing

F

Significantly elevated violation rate. This employer's safety record is among the worst on file.

Last inspected 03/13/2019

Based on public OSHA records. How is this calculated? · Data updated March 2026

According to OSHA enforcement records, Albert Basse Associates in Stoughton, Massachusetts has 35 workplace safety violations across 7 inspections, with 25 classified as serious and $16,450 in total penalties. Safety grade: F (significantly elevated violations). OSHA records span 1994 to 2019.

Albert Basse Associates in Stoughton, Massachusetts has received an F safety grade, indicating a significantly elevated rate of workplace safety violations compared to other employers. Within the manufacturing industry, this places Albert Basse Associates among the most frequently cited employers. An F grade is assigned when an employer's weighted violation score exceeds 6.0 per inspection, factoring in the severity of each citation.

25 of the 35 violations on record are classified as serious, meaning OSHA determined they posed a risk of death or serious physical harm. Workers at employers with F safety grades may want to understand their rights under OSHA regulations, including the right to file a complaint about unsafe working conditions without fear of retaliation. Massachusetts workers who have been injured on the job may also be eligible for workers' compensation benefits.

5.0 Albert Basse Associates violations/inspection
vs
4.1 Manufacturing avg
Above industry average
View Manufacturing industry report →
35 Violations
7 Inspections
25 Serious
$16,450 Penalties
Serious?
25 ($15,700)
Other-than-Serious?
10 ($750)
1910.0147 Lockout/Tagout — Machines
Cited in 3 inspections (4 total) since 1994
1910.0178 Powered Industrial Trucks (Forklifts)
Cited in 3 inspections (3 total) since 2007
1910.0212 Machine Guarding — General
Cited in 3 inspections (3 total) since 2007
1910.0219 Lockout/Tagout (Energy Control)
Cited in 3 inspections (3 total) since 1997
1910.0305 Electrical — Wiring Methods
Cited in 2 inspections (3 total) since 1997
Violations decreased 100% over the past 5 years (0 recent vs 35 prior).
OSHA initially proposed $35,400 in penalties for Albert Basse Associates, later reduced to $16,450 — a 54% reduction through informal settlement or contest. Learn how OSHA penalties work.
1910.0147 Lockout/Tagout — Machines
4 citations $1,000
1910.0305 Electrical — Wiring Methods
3 citations $350
1910.0219 Lockout/Tagout (Energy Control)
3 citations $2,800
1910.0212 Machine Guarding — General
3 citations $2,800
1910.0178 Powered Industrial Trucks (Forklifts)
3 citations $2,012

Workers' Compensation in Massachusetts

Workers injured on the job in Massachusetts may be entitled to medical coverage, temporary & permanent disability, death benefits, vocational rehabilitation, disfigurement benefits.

This is general information about workers' compensation laws in Massachusetts, not legal advice. Consult a licensed attorney for your specific situation.

Were you injured at Albert Basse Associates?

This employer has 35 OSHA violations on record, including 25 classified as serious. If you've been hurt on the job, you may be entitled to compensation.

Free case review · No obligation · Confidential

Attorney advertising. Free consultations available in most states. Not legal advice. By submitting, you agree to be contacted about your potential claim.

No workplace accident investigations on file for Albert Basse Associates in OSHA records.

DateTypeLocationViolationsPenalties
03/13/2019 Planned? Stoughton, MA 1 $0
11/07/2013 Monitoring? Stoughton, MA 0 $0
06/11/2013 Planned? Stoughton, MA 8 $8,050
09/30/2010 Planned? Stoughton, MA 4 $950
05/22/2007 Planned? Stoughton, MA 14 $5,162
06/11/1997 Planned? Stoughton, MA 5 $788
05/06/1994 Accident? Stoughton, MA 3 $1,500

Improve Your Safety Grade

Links may be affiliate-supported. This does not affect our safety ratings or recommendations.

Injured at Albert Basse Associates? You may be entitled to compensation. Get Free Case Review